ABSTRACT
Background Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and COVID-19 significantly impact on coagulation system. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore the prevalence of thrombotic and bleeding events in COVID-19 patients supported with ECMO, summarize anticoagulation regimens, and guide future research. Methods Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed were searched for studies examining thrombosis and bleeding in COVID-19 patients requiring ECMO. The primary outcomes were prevalence of different types of hemorrhage and thrombosis. The pooled estimated rates and relative risk (RR) were calculated to summarize the outcomes. Results Twenty-three peer-reviewed studies involving 6,878 subjects were included. For thrombotic events, the prevalence of circuit thrombosis was 21.5% (95% CI: 15.5%–27.6%;1,532 patients);ischemic stroke was 2.6% (95% CI: 1.5%–3.7%;5,926 patients);and pulmonary embolism (PE) was 11.8% (95% CI: 6.8%–16.8%;5,853 patients). For bleeding events, 37.4% of patients experienced major hemorrhage (95% CI: 28.1%–46.8%;1,558 patients) and 9.9% experienced intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (95% CI: 7.8%–12.1%;6,348 patients). COVID-19 cases on ECMO complicated with more ICH than non-COVID-19 patients on respiratory ECMO [RR=2.23 (95% CI: 1.32–3.75)]. Anticoagulation strategies varied among centers. Conclusions Circuit thrombosis and major bleeding were the most common thrombotic and bleeding events. The incidence of ICH was significantly higher when ECMO was indicated for COVID-19 than for other respiratory diseases. There is no evidence for stronger anticoagulation practice and remains no consistent anticoagulation strategy to reduce the occurrence of thrombosis and bleeding under the double "hit” of COVID-19 and ECMO.
ABSTRACT
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and COVID-19 significantly impact the coagulation system. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore the prevalence of thrombotic and bleeding events in patients with COVID-19 supported with ECMO, summarize anticoagulation regimens, and guide future research. Methods: Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed were searched for studies examining thrombosis and bleeding in patients with COVID-19 requiring ECMO. The primary outcomes were the prevalences of different types of hemorrhage and thrombosis. The pooled estimated rates and relative risk (RR) were calculated to summarize the outcomes. Results: Twenty-three peer-reviewed studies involving 6878 subjects were included. For thrombotic events, the prevalence of circuit thrombosis was 21.5% (95% CI: 15.5%-27.6%; 1532 patients), that of ischemic stroke was 2.6% (95% CI: 1.5%-3.7%; 5926 patients), and that of pulmonary embolism (PE) was 11.8% (95% CI: 6.8%-16.8%; 5853 patients). For bleeding events, 37.4% of the patients experienced major hemorrhage (95% CI: 28.1%-46.8%; 1558 patients) and 9.9% experienced intracranial hemorrhage (ICH; 95% CI: 7.8%-12.1%; 6348 patients). COVID-19 cases on ECMO were complicated with more ICH than patients without COVID-19 on respiratory ECMO [RR = 2.23 (95% CI: 1.32-3.75)]. Anticoagulation strategies varied among centers. Conclusions: Circuit thrombosis and major bleeding were the most common thrombotic and bleeding events. The incidence of ICH was significantly higher when ECMO was indicated for COVID-19 than for other respiratory diseases. There is no evidence for stronger anticoagulation practice, and remains no consistent anticoagulation strategy to reduce the occurrence of thrombosis and bleeding under the double "hit" of COVID-19 and ECMO.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is employed to support critically ill COVD-19 patients. The occurrence of ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), as well as the implementation of anticoagulation strategies under the dual influence of ECMO and COVID-19 remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the ischemic stroke, ICH and overall in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO and summarize the anticoagulation regimens. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched for studies examining ischemic stroke, ICH, and mortality in COVID-19 patients supported with ECMO. The outcomes were incidences of ischemic stroke, ICH, overall in-hospital mortality and anticoagulation regimens. We calculated the pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to summarize the results. RESULTS: We analyzed 12 peer-reviewed studies involving 6039 COVID-19 patients. The incidence of ischemic stroke had a pooled estimate of 2.2% (95% CI: 1.2%-3.2%). The pooled prevalence of ICH was 8.0% (95% CI: 6.3%-9.6%). The pooled estimate of overall in-hospital mortality was 40.3% (95% CI: 33.1%-47.5%). The occurrence of ICH was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients supported with ECMO than in other respiratory ECMO [relative risk=1.75 (95% CI: 1.00-3.07)]. Unfractionated heparin was the most commonly used anticoagulant, and anticoagulation monitoring practice varied among centers. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic stroke and ICH were common under the double "hit" of COVID-19 and ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients supported with ECMO than non-COVID-19 patients requiring ECMO. Individualized anticoagulation regimens may be a good choice to balance thrombosis and bleeding. More detailed research and further exploration are needed to clarify the underlying mechanism and clinical management decisions.
ABSTRACT
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic threatening global public health. In the current paper, we describe our successful treatment of three COVID-19 pneumonia patients cases including severe cases and cases with mortality risk factors. One 32-year-old male COVID-19 patient was diagnosed with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and moderate ARDS. The second COVID-19 pneumonia patient had a history of diabetes and chronic bronchitis. The third case of COVID-19 pneumonia was an 82-year old female patient. All three cases had severe COVID pneumonia and therefore were aggressively managed with a multidisciplinary and personalized therapeutic approach that included nutritional support, antiviral pharmacotherapy, active control of comorbidities, prevention of complication development and psychological intervention. Our experience highlights the importance of the use of a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach that tailors to the specific condition of the patient in achieving a favorable clinical outcome.